Stackologists · C# on the screen
Blazor for teams who should keep writing C#
Stackologists uses Blazor when the people who will maintain the UI already think in C#, and the alternative is a crash course in a JavaScript framework they will not own.
We staff and build Blazor Server and Blazor WebAssembly, wired to the ASP.NET APIs and identity you already run. The offer is a Blazor UI your C# team can keep, not a second language tax.
Blazor Server or WebAssembly
The hosting model is the first decision, not a footnote. Stackologists will not pick it from a blog post. We pick it from how the app is used.
- Blazor Server when the live circuit is acceptable and you want thin clients — typical for internal admin tools on a reliable network.
- WebAssembly when the UI must keep working across a poor connection, or when more work has to run in the browser.
- Which public routes, if any, have to exist as HTML before the circuit or the bundle runs.
Public HTML is what a crawler can read. A search engine still decides what to index.
What we actually ship
- A Blazor admin that replaces a spreadsheet, talking to an ASP.NET Core API.
- A C# UI beside an existing MVC site, without standing up a second team.
- A person already reviewed on the hosting model you run, not on “Blazor” as a logo.
When we point you elsewhere
A JavaScript team with no C# owners should read the Angular or React page. A public marketing site with no authenticated app around it is often cheaper as static HTML, not as a Blazor shell.
Common questions
Blazor Server or WebAssembly?
Stackologists picks Blazor Server when the live circuit is acceptable and you want thin clients. WebAssembly when the UI must keep working on a poor connection.
Can a search engine read a Blazor app?
Stackologists treats public Blazor routes as HTML that exists before the circuit or the WebAssembly bundle runs. That is what a crawler can read. Indexing and ranking stay the search engine’s decision.